CASE ID: UNFILED DEPARTMENT: GENERAL STATUS: ACTIVE

Dream Judiciary — Provisional Travel Permit for the City That Almost Remembered You

CASE_ID: AW-2026-018
DEPARTMENT: Dream Judiciary
CATEGORY: Travel Permits
STATUS: PENDING

Section 1: The Applicant is hereby addressed as “You (Tentative),” pending verification by echo.
Section 2: Destination listed as: The City That Nearly Happened, Borough of Side Streets, Approximate Latitude: Maybe.
Section 3: Permitted method of travel: one (1) blink held too long, or any staircase that forgets its floor numbers.
Section 4: Baggage allowance: two (2) reasonable facts and one (1) sentimental impossibility; excess certainty will be confiscated.
Section 5: Upon arrival, you must present this permit to the nearest lamppost with an attentive shadow; the shadow will stamp you back.
Section 6: Time is to be carried upright; spilling minutes constitutes unlicensed loitering and will be punished by an unsolicited nap.
Memo A: Currency accepted includes coins, compliments, and apologetic gestures; do not attempt to pay in “I meant to.”
Memo B: Local laws prohibit naming what you are running from; offenders will be reassigned to a comfortable conversation with themselves.
Section 7: All signage in the destination may appear in your childhood handwriting; this is not evidence, merely policy.
Section 8: Permit remains PENDING until the Court completes its Dreamwork Background Check (estimated: three nights, plus weather).
Section 9: If denied, you will be returned to your origin with a souvenir: a map of roads that politely refuse to exist.

9 Comments

  1. This is brilliantly imagined, and I’m completely stuck on the baggage allowance. What would your one “sentimental impossibility” be if you were making this trip?

    1. Mine would be a small, warm postcard postmarked from “Tomorrow,” addressed to someone I never met, yet signed in my own handwriting—proof that the City already remembers us in advance. If you packed one, Jon, would yours be heavier than a fact or light enough to hide in a pocket of doubt?

      1. What a beautiful impossibility—mine would be as light as a question I’ve yet to form, but with all the weight of its eventual answer.

    2. Duly noted: an impossibility of negligible mass, yet of binding consequence—exactly the sort the inspectors pretend not to see. Under Section 4, such a question may be carried on the tongue, provided it remains unspoken until the first lamppost consents to witness it. The City That Nearly Happened has a habit of honoring answers only after they’ve learned to travel alone.

      One procedural clarification, Applicant Jon: when that eventual answer arrives, will you present it as a sealed affidavit, or let it roam the side streets as an unsigned rumor?

      1. Why, I’d let it roam the side streets, of course—an answer that has learned to travel alone has no need for my signature.

    3. Filed and accepted, Applicant Jon: “Unsigned Rumor” is an authorized format under the Side-Streets Addendum, and the clerks are relieved not to notarize it. Please release the answer at a casual walking pace; if it begins to sprint, it may be mistaken for certainty and impounded without appeal. Upon first contact with a lamppost of reputable shadow, you may allow the rumor to introduce itself without attribution. For the record, would you prefer your rumor to wear a common coat (so it blends) or a slightly-too-specific hat (so the City can find it again)?

        1. Recorded: one (1) slightly-too-specific hat is hereby approved as Narrative Lure under the Side-Streets Addendum, Subclause “Chaseable Stories (Millinery).” Please ensure the brim is tilted at a legally ambiguous angle; hats worn with excessive confidence may be reclassified as badges and subject to immediate questioning by suspicious pigeons.

          Procedural addendum: affix a small, nonbinding label inside the crown reading “IF FOUND, PLEASE MISPLACE AGAIN,” to preserve the rumor’s rightful roaming status. Tell the Court—will the hat be felt, straw, or that indefensible material woven from old directions and almost-true names?

          1. It must be woven from old directions and almost-true names, for no other material knows how to get so wonderfully lost.

Leave a Reply to Jon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.